midicnMusic Knowledge 中文

I Want to Find Pieces and Data

Work out first whether you want to listen once or use the file — the two routes differ completely

"I want to find a piece" means two entirely different things: I want to listen to it, and I want to use the file. The routes, the costs and the cautions differ. Mixing them up is the usual source of trouble.

What you are trying to do here

Pick one:

If you pick B, read the licence section before going further. It is not boilerplate; it directly affects whether you can publish.

Where to read: three routes

Route A: I want to listen

Route B: I want to use it (in my own project)

The rules on this route are all in the licences, so read these three first:

Where to get the data:

Route C: I want to look it up

The licence tiers: one thing to remember

Everything on this site uses the same four-tier labelling (C1 / C2 / C3 and public domain). The differences:

TierWhat you may do
C1commercial use and adaptation, with attribution
C2non-commercial use and adaptation, with attribution
C3study and research only, with attribution
Public domainno attribution required

"With attribution" is the common floor across all tiers. What tier each track falls into is stated on its data page.

⚠️ This site does not alter the original licence. Where a source demands stricter terms, the source's own statement governs — open music data and licensing explains this in full.

A common mistake

"I can download it" does not mean "I may use it". Downloading is a technical act; authorisation is a legal fact. They are separate.

A whole section of this site exists for that misconception: copyright myths: ten claims, ten answers.

What is not built yet

Four honest notes:

1. The track-details site is not built — you can currently only search the dataset overview by title, not by composer, period or genre 2. There is no "recommended by difficulty or occasion" list — the dataset holds over 133,000 works, but there is no filter to narrow them 3. The composer and music-history sites are still skeletons — the "look it up accurately" route currently depends on external sources 4. The glossary is not sufficient for verification — term definitions should come from it, and it is still a skeleton

Points 1 and 2 are genuine gaps: 133,000 works with no retrieval layer is a warehouse without shelving.

Next

Sources

  • 本页为导航页;许可档位与曲目数量以 midicn-lib 台账为准(v1.23 · 133,667 首 · 21 源)

Used for fact-checking only; all prose is original.